Movie Review
Name of Movie: Earth 2100___________________________________
Describe/list/ outline the main themes of the
movie. (50 words)
This movie’s about what’s going to be the earth by the
year 2100. By experts who appears in the movies, all the problems generated by
human race on the earth (climatic change by example) are occurring simultaneously
and the different government countries haven’t faced all the best they can do.
Write a review (200 words) of
the video. Highlight the importance of
the movie’s information/ themes/ topics to your own personal experience and
professional perspective.
Maybe the movies is exaggerating
with entertaining purposes, but nevertheless its well-known by many of people
who have a certain amount of knowledge of the dangers of climatic change that very of the facts described in the
movie are possibly to be real. But to me, by the year 2100, the earth isn’t
gonna be in the way the movie describes because I think it took more years to
destroy a planet than the years the movie predicts. But I agree that one of the
solutions that the movie proposes is reduce the levels of production of the factories
around the world, but that is difficult given the human nature of consuming things
even when they don’t need more of the things they are consuming. If the people
consume less the factories would leave producing on the level they do and this
maybe would generate a kind of equilibrium for the global ambient. Another fact
that this movie proposes is about the oil and how this is getting more and more
expensive to the people who drives automobiles, trucks and other stuff because
the resources of these are running out. I agree with that idea because statistics
support it strongly
List a minimum of three
facts, pieces of important information or “other” from the video that you would
like to remember and would want to tell a friend about.
1. The theme of the oils and fuel
getting expensive and that the reserves of these resources are running out.
2. The fact that the global
population is reticent to face the fact that the climatic change is a subject
to be treated and NOW!!!
Diego,
ResponderEliminarWC: 331. Ok, a bit too many, though. You made a point in your review, I think it reflects your opinion and the final three facts you mention are interesting. You should take care of some constructions that stop the flow of your writing:
and the different (government countries) (?) haven’t faced (all the best they can do)
Good review.
Cheers,
JC